Monday, 11 December 2017

THE PURPOSES OF PRIMARY EDUCATION!!!

My first post is the foundation of my pedagogical beliefs and my interpretations on the purpose of primary education.

There are many definitions of pedagogy. The Oxford dictionary’s definition is “the method and practice of teaching, especially as an academic subject or theoretical concept” (Stevenson, 2010, pg. 1309). However, professor Graham Donaldson’s definition of pedagogy simplifies that pedagogy is the teaching methods used which adapts to the needs and developmental stage of the children along with the purposes of the curriculum (Donaldson, 2015). Donaldson clarifies my pedagogical beliefs that the teaching and learning experience should be to develop autonomous and creative individuals.

Professor Donaldson set an aspiration that children and young people should comprise of certain skills and qualities once they leave education. These are the heart of the four purposes of education which will be embedded in the life and work of schools. Here is a diagram to present the four purposes (Donaldson, 2015).


Living in a democratic society, one of the main ideologies for primary education should be to create an introspective society where the citizens are capable learners, have the ability to reflect critically and responsibly make decisions for themselves. Nel Noddings proposed this concept quoting, “A primary purpose of schooling in a democratic society is to produce thoughtful citizens who can deliberate and make wise choices.” (Noddings, 2013, pg.25). This view synthesises impeccably with John Dewey’s thought of how education is highly associated with democracy and it is important to understand that the end results in education are not as significant as the awareness of development. A quote from his book implies that we should not always aspire towards the goal. 

“The process of growth and improvement and progress, rather than static out-come and result, becomes the significant thing. Not health as an end fixed once and for all, but the needed improvement in health—a continual process—is the end and good. The end is no longer a terminus or limit to be reached. It is the active process of transforming the existent situation. Not perfection as a final goal, but the ever-enduring process of perfecting, maturing, refining is the aim in living.” (Dewey, 2012, p.181) 

There are many philosophers and theorists whose views resonates Professor Donaldson’s definition about teaching. Rousseau believed that children should learn to have the ability to improve their own reasoning and have the independence to be able to solve problems themselves:

“Teach your scholar to observe the phenomena of nature; you will soon rouse his curiosity, but if you would have it grow, do not be in too great a hurry to satisfy this curiosity. Put the problems before him and let him solve them himself. Let him know nothing because you have told him, but because he has learnt it for himself. If ever you substitute authority for reason he will cease to reason, he will be a mere plaything of other people’s thoughts… ”(Rousseau, 1762, p.126

Paulo Freire’s work signifies the importance of creative and critical thinking. He believes that education should be authentic by adapting the tasks to real life situations, which allows the learners to contribute in projects and learn to defeat challenges. He quotes,

“problem posing education bases itself on creativity and stimulates true reflection and action upon reality, thereby responding to the vocation of persons as beings who are authentic only when engaged in enquiry and creative transformation.”  (Freire, 1996, pg. 65).

This style of pedagogy is most beneficial as it stimulates the learners to develop their critical and creative thinking. Freire’s philosophy directly emphasizes professor Donaldson’s process of reaching the achievement outcomes. In his report he signifies that effective teaching and learning will play a big role and he points out 12 pedagogical principles to support this new approach (Donaldson, 2015).

Although, the purpose of education in the successful futures curriculum has many benefits, this notion for the teachers and practitioners to implement into their everyday teaching “…would require careful consideration, consultation and planning, as well as sufficient time, resources and support.” (Boorman et al, 2015. pg. 3).
The design of the proposed assessment process could have some implications from a neoliberalist perspective. There will be less emphasis on competition and capitalism. The learning outcomes will not be measured to have a comparison with other schools around the world. Hicks believes that the purpose of education should be run like a business in order to prepare students to be competitive on a global scale with a neoliberal approach. There should be a strong emphasis on exams and the summative results to measure with the rest of the world (Hicks, 2010).   

The concerns regarding the possible reduction in the comparability of assessment data could have potential consequences regarding the quality assurance across the whole board. Governors felt there should be a means of comparison before GCSE to compare with UK and the rest of the world (Boorman et al, 2015).               


References

u  Dewey, J, (2012). Reconstruction in Philosophy. New York: Dover Publications.
u  Donaldson, G, (2015). Successful futures: Independent review of curriculum and assessment arrangements in Wales. Welsh Government.
u  Freire, P, (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin: London
u  Hicks, D. (2010, July). The long transition: Educating for optimism and hope in troubled times. In 3rd annual conference of the UK teacher education network for education for sustainable development/global citizenship (pp. 1-28).
u  Llorenc 0, Yasmin J, Polly S, Paula G & Isabella B, (2015). Successful futures: independent review of curriculum and assessment arrangements in wales. A report on responses to the great debate. Wavehill ltd: Ceredigion   
         
u  Noddings, N, (2013). Education and Democracy in the 21st Century. New York: Teachers College Press
u  Rousseau, J-J. (1762). The social contract. Swan Sonnenschien and co: France.
u  Stevenson, A, (2010). Oxford dictionary of English. Oxford University Press, USA.

No comments:

Post a Comment